The judgment to be reviewed is dated 16th February , and the memorandum of appeal, on which the judgment was passed was filed on 5th February Summary Please sign up to view Summary. You have reach your max limit. Get 2 points on providing a valid reason for the above change. Madhya Pradesh High Court , 22 Sep Showing top of judgment s.
Calcutta High Court , 18 Sep Bakhtawar Pande And Ors. Get 2 points on providing a valid reason for the above change. Please subscribe to download the judgment. Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature. Chaman Lal Gupta And Anr. Karnataka High Court , 17 Dec
Upload brief to use the new AI search. Allahabad High Court25 Apr Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature. Get 2 points on providing a valid reason for the above change.
The Court-fee leviable on the application for hakhtawar is governed by Art 5 and is therefore, “one half of the fee leviable on the memorandum of appeal. The question was fully discussed by the learned Judges who held that the fee on the application for review must be calculated on the basis of the fee leviable on the memorandum of appeal according to the law in force when the memorandum was filed. Hazara Singh Natha Singh Ramdasia vs. You have reach your max limit. Jogendra Chandra Dutta And Ors.
Hazaragi Film BAKHTAWAR | Hazara News
This question is not affected by the subsequent commencement of the amending Act. I agree to the reasoning and the conclusions of the learned Judges and hold that the proper court-fee has been paid.
The Court-fees Act has been amended in its application to baihtawar United Provinces by an amending Act which came into force on 1st May Dhoom Chand Jain vs. Karnataka High Court17 Dec In my opinion the amending Act does not affect the amount of fee leviable on the application for review. Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this Citation. Contains public sector information licensed under bakhtawaar Open Government Licence v3.
Hazaragi Film BAKHTAWAR
Precisely the same question arose in Nandi Ram v. This is a paid feature. The application for review of judgment was made on 13th May Key Phrases are not available yet.
Amrita Keshiba Hazaraggi Others…Defendants. Important Paras Please sign up to view Important Paras. Chaman Lal Gupta And Anr.
The question is what fee was leviable on the memorandum of appeal at the time when it was filed. The judgment to be reviewed is dated 16th Februaryand the memorandum of appeal, on which the judgment was passed was filed on 5th February The memorandum of appeal, which determines the fee leviable bakhtasar the application for review, was filed before the amending Act came into force. Rajasthan High Court27 Feb Click to upgrade Your Package to have this feature. On this interpretation the proper court fee has been paid.
new hazaragi film bakhtawar (((complet film)))
No Case or Topic can be added. Please subscribe to download the judgment. Bakhtawar Pande And Ors. Parmeshar Kurmi And Anr.
Under this amending Act the scale of advalorem fees has been enhanced. Madhya Pradesh High Court22 Sep Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. Bwkhtawar reference raises the question of the proper interpretation of Schedule I, Article 5, Court-fees Act, Allahabad High Court27 Feb Supreme Court Of India22 Apr Calcutta High Court18 Sep Summary Please sign up to view Summary.
Showing top of judgment s.
Sant Ram Aggarwal And Ors. Log In India UK.